Posts mit dem Label Peer Review werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen
Posts mit dem Label Peer Review werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen

Freitag, 26. Mai 2017

Information Hiding + Science 2.0

In a new paper, we discuss how Information Hiding can be combined with Science 2.0/Open Science.

Steffen Wendzel, Luca Caviglione, Wojciech Mazurczyk, Jean-Francois Lalande:
Network Information Hiding and Science 2.0: Can it be a Match?,
Int. Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, Vol. 63(2), pp. 217-222, 2017.

Abstract:
Science 2.0 aims at using the information sharing and collaborative features of the Internet to offer new features to the research community. Science 2.0 has been already applied to computer sciences, especially bioinformatics. For network information hiding, a field studying the possibility of concealing a communication in networks, the application of Science 2.0 is still a rather uncovered territory. To foster the discussion of potential benefits for network information hiding, we provide a disquisition for six different Science 2.0 aspects when applied to this domain.

PDF Download: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316215336_Network_Information_Hiding_and_Science_20_Can_it_be_a_Match [accessed May 26, 2017].

Montag, 9. Januar 2017

New Publication: Unified Description for Network Information Hiding Methods

We published a new paper related to network information hiding patterns. This time, we provide a way for a unified description of hiding methods (hiding techniques). In other words: if a new hiding technique must be described in a scientific paper, so that it can be published, we propose a clear structure for the description of the new technique.

S. Wendzel, W. Mazurczyk, S. Zander: Unified Description for Network Information Hiding Methods, Journal of Universal Computer Science (J.UCS), Vol. 22(11), 2016.

Abstract:
Until now hiding methods in network steganography have been described in arbitrary ways, making them difficult to compare. For instance, some publications describe classical channel characteristics, such as robustness and bandwidth, while others describe the embedding of hidden information. We introduce the first unified description of hiding methods in network steganography. Our description method is based on a comprehensive analysis of the existing publications in the domain. When our description method is applied by the research community, future publications will be easier to categorize, compare and extend. Our method can also serve as a basis to evaluate the novelty of hiding methods proposed in the future.

Keywords: covert channels, design patterns, information hiding, network security, scientific methodology, scientific pratice, steganography

You can download the full-text here (open access).

Samstag, 21. November 2015

How Patterns Support the Novelty Evaluation of Research

The research discipline of network steganography deals with the hiding of information within network transmissions, e.g. to transfer illicit information in networks with Internet censorship.

The last decades of research on network steganography led to more than hundred techniques for hiding data in network transmissions. However, previous research has shown that most of these hiding techniques are either based on the same idea or introduce limited novelty, enabling the application of existing countermeasures.


In a new paper, Steffen Wendzel and Carolin Palmer provide a link between the field of creativity and network steganographic research. We propose a framework and a metric to help evaluating the creativity bound to a given hiding technique. This way, we support two sides of the scientific peer review process as both authors and reviewers can use our framework to analyze the novelty and applicability of hiding techniques. At the same time, we contribute to a uniform terminology in network steganography.


Publication:
S. Wendzel, C. Palmer: Creativity in Mind: Evaluating and Maintaining Advances in Network Steganographic Research, in: Journal of Universal Computer Science (J.UCS), Vol. 21, No. 12, pp. 1684--1705, 2015.